4 ms·
I haven't personally switched away from Mongrel yet, but the community seems to agree with you and Passenger/REE probably are the "future" (er, current?) best d
by mishmash 17y ago
I haven't personally switched away from Mongrel yet, but the community seems to agree with you and Passenger/REE probably are the "future" (er, current?) best deployment method - which is fine by me.
What bothers me, though, is how for some at least, Mongrel must be completely vilified before Passenger is able to become the next in a long line of Ruby deployments progressions.
Idk, I just don't understand the need for those type of motivations.
- carbon8 17y agoOr, perhaps, rather than some grand plan to vilify mongrel in order to pave the way for passenger, people are simply expressing their views and opinions.
- mishmash 17y agoYeah you may be right, but these almost "religious" deployment transition seem familiar to me, remembering... FastCGI -> LigHTTP (+others) -> Mongrel -> Passenger, and it seems like we've had a crucifixion at each stage of development. But idk and it's late.
- goodgoblin 17y agoI think at each stage the vitriol has decreased as a function of the maturity of the solutions. FastCGI was desperately bad.