4 ms·
iTunes is cross-platform, widely in use, and comes with a built-in music store. If I bought a non-Apple music player, I'd much prefer it to support iTunes than
by Sidnicious 17y ago
iTunes is cross-platform, widely in use, and comes with a built-in music store. If I bought a non-Apple music player, I'd much prefer it to support iTunes than to come with its own music management software.
Apple's being an ass for not letting third-party music players legitimately interface with iTunes.
- litewulf 17y ago(though to be honest, I would much prefer my music player to require NO software. I love that my iriver is just USB storage when hooked up. If I wanted to sync music, I'd like the choice to do whatever I want.)
- lyime 17y agoYou can select the music you want through playlists using iTunes. I find dragging and dropping audio files (usb storage) very un-intuitive .
- Dobbs 17y agoI already using Unison to sync my music between my various computers. I would much rather have a usb device that I can just use with unison then have to add another program to my computer-use-flow.
- endtime 17y agoSo how do you manage playlists?
- litewulf 17y agoI...don't? I have a now playing queue that repeats and shuffles. (I actually use windows media player to listen to music. Because it er, lets me queue up a few hours of music and then plays it. I've used winamp, foobar and itunes, but I really don't need any features beyond "plays whatever I drag/drop in".)
- endtime 17y agoOkay, fair enough. Glad that works for you. But you should understand that some people (such as myself) do want playlists, and that making MP3 players just appear as USB drives (rather than syncing with a client) would make this a pain.
- litewulf 17y agoAre m3u files enough? Or do you actually want things like smart playlists? Because I think everyone supports m3us as well. I recognize other people use their computers differently. I'm just kind of disappointed that so many things are bound up in proprietary databases or formats.
- Batsu 17y agoI agree. In fact, I thought one of the reasons Apple was contesting for non-DRM songs was so users could be free to choose their media players. Sort of a... sign of good faith if you will. I guess I learned something today.
- potatolicious 17y agoApple only made the move to non-DRM songs when Amazon opened their DRM-free music store. There's no good faith in anything Apple has done recently - as a Mac user I'm disappointed with how draconian Apple has gotten as of late.
- statictype 17y agoI believe there is an API of some sort that allows 3rd party players to integrate with iTunes. The Pre didn't bother to go that route, instead choosing to emulate an iPod. Although it's possible that the 3rd party devices are not first-class devices the way an iPod is (in fact, knowing Apple, that's almost certainly the case).
- lacker 17y agoApple makes money off selling iPods, not selling songs through iTunes. Why would they want to make other music players better by writing software for them?
- nudded 17y agoApple being an ass for storing the library in an open xml document any other third party client can read? like Nokia has been doing for years? Don't you think it's completly rational what Apple is doing here?
- Zak 17y agoNot really. If I had a Pre and was using it with iTunes, Apple intentionally crippling it would make me less likely to consider Apple products in the future. Come to think of it, it's having that effect on me anyway, even though I'm not affected at all. Apple is certainly within their rights to cripple their consumer applications in any way they want, but it does not make me think they're looking out for my best interests as a user.