> Here is where the science side gets things wrong. Creationism is a NON-scientific belief, not an ANTI-scientific belief. Creationism isn't fundamentally anti

> Here is where the science side gets things wrong. Creationism is a NON-scientific belief, not an ANTI-scientific belief. Creationism isn't fundamentally anti-scientific, but it teaching it as science is definitely anti-scientific. "Creationism" is usually, in this context, used as shorthand for "creationism taught as science", because that's the only kind of creationism that matters (in this context).