4 ms·
So if a browser like, say, Sleipnir implements the EME standard and is then able to act as a channel for streaming DRM-protected content... how does that imply
by bovermyer 13y ago
So if a browser like, say, Sleipnir implements the EME standard and is then able to act as a channel for streaming DRM-protected content... how does that imply that Evil Demons of Corporatocracy are taking over the entire system?
- Isofarro 13y agoSleipnir claims to run on Windows and Mac. Platforms owned by Microsoft and Apple, who coincidentally also own two of the main three DRM implementations (PlayReady and FairPlay). Then Google will add their WideVine DRM scheme. The difficulty isn't EME, but the proprietary blackbox it interfaces to. Without the blackbox, EME is worthless.
- pyalot2 13y agoLink to the documentation and blob d/ls for encoding/playback. Is that so much to ask? It's an "open technology" isn't it? Anybody can implement a browser right? Link, link, link. It's not difficult, see, all I need is that magical link, and I'll shut up. Show me the link, shooooow meeeee the link baby. Yeah, thought so.