3 ms·

I don't get the presidential part. Lots of statements about response time being better, then the guy with nearly double the load time won the election? Not th

I don't get the presidential part. Lots of statements about response time being better, then the guy with nearly double the load time won the election? Not that I'm arguing against page speed, just found that odd in the info graphic.. Also, it wouldn't hurt to perfect your load times! http://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartbear.com%2Fhomed%2F http://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=h... 54/100 mobile & 77/100 desktop when I tested it

piqufoh 13y ago
Guessing in the dark from someone who didn't follow the US election - Maybe Romney's campaign was doing better than Obama's three weeks before the vote? I do agree though, the presidential thing sounds confused.
stefantalpalaru 13y ago
They are somewhat confused. In the Amazon section, they write "A 1-SECOND DECREASE IN AMAZON'S PAGE LOAD TIME WOULD ANNUALLY COST [...]" instead of "increase".