3 ms·
And similarly, the list [1,2,3,4] is not a monad, and that's why "flatmappable" isn't a sensible alternative to "monad", as Bracha recently suggested. Though s
by Chattered 13y ago
And similarly, the list [1,2,3,4] is not a monad, and that's why "flatmappable" isn't a sensible alternative to "monad", as Bracha recently suggested.
Though some have argued that this confusion indicates a hole in our vocabulary:
http://blog.plover.com/prog/haskell/monad-terminology.html http://blog.plover.com/prog/haskell/monad-terminology.html
- codeflo 13y agoGreat link, that's about what I'm getting at. MJD states it more clearly than I could.