4 ms·
It's not about whether UX is important or not - and I agree it is. It's about what 'exponentially better' means. Which is to say, nothing technical, and hence s
by dojomouse 13y ago
It's not about whether UX is important or not - and I agree it is. It's about what 'exponentially better' means. Which is to say, nothing technical, and hence something buzzwordy without a solid foundation.
It doesn't detract from the product I'm sure. But he could just as easily have said 'vastly superior', and so doing not made me go 'Danger, danger, casual disregard for meaning ahead'. Especially since disregard for meaning is a bad thing in UI design.
- mrjatx 13y agoOut of all the things to focus on in the article it's that?
- dojomouse 13y agoNope. There are lots of much more interesting things in the article. That's just the one that jumped out at me as I read the first paragraph. And it's already got more screen space than it probably deserves. Onwards to other topics!
- InformalRelief 13y agoMuch more interesting? Mathematically more interesting!