But much harder to hide. The strict punishments of yore were compensation for the lack of a mature "battle tested" set of tolerable laws, not to mention the lim

But much harder to hide. The strict punishments of yore were compensation for the lack of a mature "battle tested" set of tolerable laws, not to mention the limitations of contemporary forensics. The odds of getting caught for murder are greatly higher in 2000s Germany than 1300s. Plus, technology provides distractions that are sustainably more rewarding than violence. We can satisfy our "quench for violence" with sports, movies, videogames, and perhaps even conversation/debate. We've got intellectual room to explore now. As contemporary programming languages are significantly more expressive than past versions, think about the unknown concepts of our ancestors. As Michael Chriton said in "Aliens Cause Global Warming": "Remember, people in 1900 didn't know what an atom was. They didn't know its structure. They also didn't know what a radio was, or an airport, or a movie, or a television, or a computer, or a cell phone, or a jet, an antibiotic, a rocket, a satellite, an MRI, ICU, IUD, IBM, IRA, ERA, EEG, EPA, IRS, DOD, PCP, HTML, internet. interferon, instant replay, remote sensing, remote control, speed dialing, gene therapy, gene splicing, genes, spot welding, heat-seeking, bipolar, prozac, leotards, lap dancing, email, tape recorder, CDs, airbags, plastic explosive, plastic, robots, cars, liposuction, transduction, superconduction, dish antennas, step aerobics, smoothies, twelve-step, ultrasound, nylon, rayon, teflon, fiber optics, carpal tunnel, laser surgery, laparoscopy, corneal transplant, kidney transplant, AIDS... None of this would have meant anything to a person in the year 1900. They wouldn't know what you are talking about." And how many more concepts a person in 1900 knew than one in 1800, and so on. Interacting with people through violence is like writing native code. Most realized that making stuff ("assembly") is more fun and profitable.