3 ms·
The entire post seems to be a copy of the source from NYT in 1996. I wonder what advances have been done in this field from that date to now? Not much on wikipe
by chillax 13y ago
The entire post seems to be a copy of the source from NYT in 1996. I wonder what advances have been done in this field from that date to now? Not much on wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_uterus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_uterus)
- uptown 13y agoEntirely different - but the first successful uterus transplant recently occurred. Unfortunately, she lost the baby at 8 weeks. http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/04/12/worlds-first-successful-uterus-transplant-recipient-is-pregnant-via-in-vitro-fertilization/ http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/04/12/worlds-first-successfu... http://shine.yahoo.com/healthy-living/womb-transplant-patient-derya-sert-loses-baby-211659723.html http://shine.yahoo.com/healthy-living/womb-transplant-patien...