4 ms·
Dude, come on. You're actively ignoring his point, which is that that it makes no sense to bitch about the viral nature of the GPL and then complain (sorry, la
by calambrac 17y ago
Dude, come on. You're actively ignoring his point, which is that that it makes no sense to bitch about the viral nature of the GPL and then complain (sorry, lament) when a project doesn't choose to use a BSD license because of what you're then prevented from doing. That's just a lame attempt to substitute a legal requirement with a social one.
And just because he didn't surround your tweet with its full context, that doesn't mean he misused it. He responded to the exact point you made. Funny that this is basically an analogue of the point he's making about the license: you say something in public and then lament that someone goes off and uses it in a way you didn't want them to.
- jnoller 17y agoNo; you see I don't care what license he uses. No one has been attacking him, and ultimately, what license he chooses is the license he chooses. Done. Disagreement with a position is not bitching, nor is it attacking.
- calambrac 17y agoyou see I don't care what license he uses. You said that you 'lament' that you can't use his code - how could you expect anyone to interpret that as something other than caring about the license that's preventing you from doing so? No one has been attacking him That's not true, a lot of people have been attacking him, but if you read my comment again, you should hopefully realize I never accused you of being one of them. I accused you of ignoring his point and of needlessly whining about how he used your tweet.