Since many are using Steam as an example of DRM - the important difference is that Steam is a free product, but is not open-source (though it can be used to dis

Since many are using Steam as an example of DRM - the important difference is that Steam is a free product, but is not open-source (though it can be used to distribute open-source). It is produced by a company as a means of distributing their products. It is not even a valid comparison to the blinkard pig ignorance of the secret DRM requirements in HTML, which is an open standard. I'd just like to know what dipshit at the W3 signed off on this.