4 ms·
The author is not confused about non-native resolutions; they pointedly mentioned that regardless of settings, they could not get lower screen resolutions to fi
by binarycrusader 13y ago
The author is not confused about non-native resolutions; they pointedly mentioned that regardless of settings, they could not get lower screen resolutions to fill the entire panel:
Regardless of panel scaling options, the UP3214Q would not
fill the screen at lower resolutions.
Since they were talking about the nVidia card in the context, I assume they're talking about the nVidia control panel settings for this. But it's possible they were referring to some options the display offered.
- rwg 13y agoI don't know, then. The monitor's manual describes an "aspect ratio" setting with "16:9", "auto resize", "4:3", and "1:1" options, which implies the monitor does have a scaler built-in. It sounds like they used the "1:1" setting or did something wacky with the GPU's driver such that it was centering a lower resolution screen image on native resolution output.
- jamesaguilar 13y agoIt wouldn't have anything to do with panel scaling options if they were doing what your parent suggested. They'd be using the nvidia control panel.
- binarycrusader 13y agoAs I said, it's unclear. I could construe "panel scaling" options as the nVidia ones. nVidia even refers to them in documentation as "panel scaling" options.