2 ms·
I got a bit confused when he compared the Kaveri to the Intel. Not one of the charts had the Intel CPU even showing up. And at the end, the graphic compares the
by ScottWhigham 13y ago
I got a bit confused when he compared the Kaveri to the Intel. Not one of the charts had the Intel CPU even showing up. And at the end, the graphic compares the Kaveri A10-7860 to the i5-4670K whereas the charts were using the i7-4770R.
- sliverstorm 13y agoThey were confusing charts, not what you are used to seeing. The charts were normalized to the Intel chip; thus a positive bar for an AMD chip in that graph means relative improvement to the Intel chip, and a negative bar relative loss to the Intel chip. Confusing, and of course the meanings reverse with "lower-is-better" graphs. The way I usually see to show normalized performance is normalizing to 100 rather than 0. An example, normalizing on the A10-6700: http://media.bestofmicro.com/M/1/387001/original/Average-perf.png http://media.bestofmicro.com/M/1/387001/original/Average-per...