This seems like a really cool idea, but I'm not sure if the results are meaningful, and I'm very doubtful that any of the results are actionable. Reading the ac

This seems like a really cool idea, but I'm not sure if the results are meaningful, and I'm very doubtful that any of the results are actionable. Reading the actual paper, all of the phrases are just 2-3 words, and most are extremely generic phrases. ("used in a", "all supporters", "pledged", "information at", etc) These phrases may have predictive power due to some broad trends in language, but I don't see how to extract meaning or intuition from the lists of top 100 positive and negative words. Perhaps I just lack an understanding of the statistics though.