4 ms·
Well, kind of. Apparently ~20% of the web is wordpress, ~3% use Joomla, ~2% Drupal, and many other PHP CMS's after that. So, yes, they are running PHP, but mo
by deckiedan 13y ago
Well, kind of. Apparently ~20% of the web is wordpress, ~3% use Joomla, ~2% Drupal, and many other PHP CMS's after that.
So, yes, they are running PHP, but most of the PHP usage is simply running 'standard' software, and if you're not developing within those, (either core, or plugins), then it's a much smaller percent of sites which actually are custom written by programmers which actually run PHP.
So, I guess my point is, that even if a lot of the web is 'running' PHP, how much future development actually will use it? And as 'hackers', people writing new, cutting edge, different websites & apps, does PHP have anything to offer really, beyond easy to set up blogging and CMS systems for non-programmer clients?
As far as I understand it, PHP is used at FB only really because that's what it was originally written in. If Mark Z. had chosen Ruby, would FB now be working on ruby compilers and so on?
- krapp 13y agoPerhaps, but aren't the bulk of today's non-PHP sites running on the standard frameworks for those languages? How many 'hackers' write Android apps without spending the bulk of their time in Eclipse, working with other people's code? There aren't a lot of pgs out there deciding to reinvent every wheel on the train. I don't think you can necessarily dismiss the impact of 'blogging and CMS' systems when judging the future of a web application language. They may not be sexy, but almost everything everybody wants to do amounts to a CRUD app turning database records into html, and you can do that in any language. I wouldn't recommend PHP for general purpose scripting though. Right now I like python for that.