4 ms·
for what it's worth, i stopped actually using them because they both suck terribly even before you compare them to their Google alternatives. maps has notoriou
by catshirt 13y ago
for what it's worth, i stopped actually using them because they both suck terribly even before you compare them to their Google alternatives.
maps has notoriously bad data.
- IBM 13y agoBetter start giving it a look again with the trend Google's services are heading in.
- natevancouver 13y agoThere is mapping data, and then there is place data (where a business is located). Google and Apple must use the same mapping data, because I see the same errors in both apps. Of course with Google, after I report the error it gets fixed. I can’t say the same for Apple. And Navteq* has more detailed and accurate data than either of them. What Google has is superb place data. Apple has… Yelp. *Assuming you have recent Navteq data. Not the nav system in your car that hasn’t been updated in 2 years.
- Angostura 13y agoSomething's happened with Apple place data in the UK in the last month or two - it's suddenly become... OK. It was a laughable joke before.