4 ms·
nope. this is highly sensitive data, you can't treat it like a private business does, say like Target. this needs to survive countless audits, from code, to d
by pinaceae 13y ago
nope.
this is highly sensitive data, you can't treat it like a private business does, say like Target.
this needs to survive countless audits, from code, to docs, to various accessiblity and other norms.
a large number of data interfaces in the background to byzantine and opaque systems.
etc etc etc.
COMPLIANCE is the cost driver. and not necessarily for a bad reason.
- erichocean 13y agothis is highly sensitive data, you can't treat it like a private business does, say like Target. You're joking, right? Because the lack of care that was put into security is WIDELY documented. They couldn't even get internal signoffs on security and decided to launch anyway. It's simple, really: the government doesn't care if they break their own laws. The laws are for everyone else.
- pinaceae 13y agothat's launch, in a rushed way. political decision. but as you see, highly visible. some new business site/app does not fall under the same public and governmental scrutiny. the ones that do with the same scope as this site - cost as much.
- joelrunyon 13y agoStill, I think for 85 million I could figure out a way.