Seriously! Feels like 1999. I thought it was lazy resizing in an image editor, but it turns out it's just bad CSS. They have a "max-width" on "BODY IMG", but

Seriously! Feels like 1999. I thought it was lazy resizing in an image editor, but it turns out it's just bad CSS. They have a "max-width" on "BODY IMG", but then some script or some deployment process added "width:" and "height:" on each image individually. The max-width alone would resize the image nicely, but the presence of the "height:" causes the vertical stretch. (Sorry, the web-debugger in me kicks in without being asked.)