4 ms·
As an example, my high school class of 310 students had several original bands which easily surpasses the 1% mark for creators. Considering the context of int
by parfe 13y ago
As an example, my high school class of 310 students had several original bands which easily surpasses the 1% mark for creators. Considering the context of internet posting, "good" or "famous" really don't come into it. In the pre-internet or offline world, 1 in 100 people being content creators seems a trivial threshold to cross.
- sentenza 13y agoI'd say that the further you go back, the higher the conent creator ratio was. The absence of storage is what made it possible and the absence of storage is why it wasn't conserved. What do you do when there is no music? You start to sing.
- mcguire 13y agoHow many of those bands played for the public? How many made a CD, tape, or record (depending on how old you are)? I'll stop before I ask if any of them produced a commercial album; I bet I know that answer. "Famous" does not come into the picture, but one thing the Internet has done is make publication possible. It is the difference between no one listening to your band and no one being able to listen. But depending on how you look at it, the difference between 0 and 1 is either tiny or infinite.