4 ms·
That was more of a professional/server release, not a consumer release, no? If 2000 is included, you can also include 2008, which was also good.
by rthomas6 13y ago
That was more of a professional/server release, not a consumer release, no? If 2000 is included, you can also include 2008, which was also good.
- pmelendez 13y ago2000 wasn't server only, it was an iteration of the NT brand that got merged with the Chicago (9X) line since XP. Windows 2008 was in fact a server only version. I wonder if MS would have less trouble if they were doing the integration of windows brands in the same way that they did with NT and 9X.