3 ms·
Slurry Discussion Continued: If you are making the argument that there is a monetary threshold that needs to be met in order to be happy (for a normal person)
by Sakes 13y ago
Slurry Discussion Continued:
If you are making the argument that there is a monetary threshold that needs to be met in order to be happy (for a normal person) I would agree. What that exact threshold is I am not sure. In my youth I had enough to be happy on 40k a year even though I wasn't, but this was due to a lack of understanding/perspective.
If you are making the argument that money directly buys happiness, I would say this is a short sighted and incorrect view.
Did I summarize your point in either case above? What was your exact point? I'd like to discuss further.
Also, pertaining to the specific article, satisfaction and happiness (while similar) are two different things for me. I am not sure why they took a survey concerning satisfaction and assumed that "satisfaction" is synonymous with happiness for all participants.
- slurry 13y agoNot sure we actually disagree. I wasn't taking issue with your main point or your list so much just costing it out (roughly) for my own amusement. Both a sense of perspective and a modicum of cash are necessary but not, imho, by themselves sufficient to be happy. Together maybe they are enough? Maybe not? Idk. Appreciate your continuation of the discussion.
- Sakes 13y agoThanks for the clarification. "Both a sense of perspective and a modicum of cash are necessary but not, imho, by themselves sufficient to be happy." I am 100% in agreement with this.