4 ms·
This is completely egregious. Deleting now. I love that the developer's defense is that he could have sold our passwords to someone but (supposedly) didn't. Th
by morgante 13y ago
This is completely egregious. Deleting now.
I love that the developer's defense is that he could have sold our passwords to someone but (supposedly) didn't. That really instills confidence in his morals, doesn't it?
- csmattryder 13y agoIt's almost akin to "I stabbed you in the leg, but see, I could've stabbed you in the heart!". Would avoid this developer 100% from now on, Chrome or otherwise.
- prafuitu 13y agoMy claim was not that I could have sold your passwords, it was that I could have sold the extension! Last time I checked, the extension itself was my property and I could sell it to whoever I want. What the buyer does with it shouldn't be any of my concerns. I was just pointing out that, if I would have sold it, the buyer might have been the kind of person that would do those terrible things. Read more carefully next time, ok?!