4 ms·
>That's not racism. He stated "doing jobs white people don't like doing." How do you interpret this? This is, by definition, stating that by being white alon
by mjolk 13y ago
>That's not racism.
He stated "doing jobs white people don't like doing." How do you interpret this? This is, by definition, stating that by being white alone, the population carries a characteristic.
>I don't see where he assigned a value to this prediction.
They're independent clauses ("I question that this event is occurring _and_ it seems as if by the preposition 'as a taxpayer', you expect a little theatrics instead of quiet aversion of harm.").
- notdrunkatall 13y ago>He stated "doing jobs white people don't like doing." How do you interpret this? This is, by definition, stating that by being white alone, the population carries a characteristic. Only if you're a twat. He was making a general observation: that minorities tend to do jobs that white people don't want to do. And he's right. That's a simple observation, one which carries no value judgment. It just is. That's not being racist; it's making an observation. If you think that any statement which differentiates between the races in any way - even if only tangentially - is a racist statement, then frankly, you need to get over yourself.
- mjolk 13y ago>Only if you're a twat... you need to get over yourself. You're adorable. You must be the life of parties.
- notdrunkatall 13y agoYOUR FACE IS STUPID!!!