Abstract of the cited article (http://www.nber.org/papers/w18992?utm_campaign=ntw&utm_medium=email&utm_source=ntw http://www.nber.org/papers/w18992?utm_campaign

Abstract of the cited article (http://www.nber.org/papers/w18992?utm_campaign=ntw&utm_medium=email&utm_source=ntw http://www.nber.org/papers/w18992?utm_campaign=ntw&utm_mediu...): Many scholars have argued that once “basic needs” have been met, higher income is no longer associated with higher in subjective well-being. We assess the validity of this claim in comparisons of both rich and poor countries, and also of rich and poor people within a country. Analyzing multiple datasets, multiple definitions of “basic needs” and multiple questions about well-being, we find no support for this claim. The relationship between well-being and income is roughly linear-log and does not diminish as incomes rise. If there is a satiation point, we are yet to reach it.