3 ms·
Think this through, why would someone licensed a piece of tech be able to use on its behalf? This is like saying that I have the rights to use the Unity engine
by mjolk 13y ago
Think this through, why would someone licensed a piece of tech be able to use on its behalf?
This is like saying that I have the rights to use the Unity engine, so I should be able to sue Microsoft for parts of Silverlight that I think are infringing and profit personally.
- sehrope 13y agoI'm not saying that all licenses have this property. I'm saying it may be possible to create a custom one that does. For example a "standard" software license (proprietary ... not OSS) does not include the right to sub-license but there do exist software licenses that include that right. Having a license doesn't mean you can sue. Having a "license to sue" might though! (if it can exist)
- NickNameNick 13y agoI don't think that that is transferable, In the media-tomb(?name might be wrong, and I know copyright is different) case, the lawsuits were all eventually shut down because the plaintiff, being the 'right to sue' licensee and not the owner, didn't actually have standing or right to sue.