3 ms·
At $500, there are FAR better monitors. You keep repeating this as if it is some magic mantra. You have not defined any what "better" really means in manner th
by shiven 13y ago
At $500, there are FAR better monitors.
You keep repeating this as if it is some magic mantra. You have not defined any what "better" really means in manner that can be quantified and compared without introducing subjective opinions of a user.
Also, care to link to these "better" monitors, including sellers that sell these for the $500 price, as well as non-subjective reviews?
- f00_ 13y agoBetter monitors very easily be objectively conceived. Latency, refresh rate, contrast ratio, brightness, input options, are all easily measured. "Better" monitors are easily found through a simple search, and how do you exactly determine a review to be "non-subjective"? http://www.displaylag.com/display-database/ http://www.displaylag.com/display-database/ http://thewirecutter.com/leaderboard/tvs/ http://thewirecutter.com/leaderboard/tvs/ http://thewirecutter.com/reviews/a-great-27-inch-lcd-monitor/ http://thewirecutter.com/reviews/a-great-27-inch-lcd-monitor...
- randallsquared 13y agoWhat latency is better than what brightness?
- f00_ 13y agoI can see where you going with that, and I'll agree it's subjective, as to which suits your needs, but I think you can find TV's that are all around better.