4 ms·
There's absolutely no difference from 60Hz to anything above it.
by largote 13y ago
There's absolutely no difference from 60Hz to anything above it.
- fdkz 13y agoYes, there is. I have side-by-side 60Hz and 120Hz monitors, and window dragging for example on the 120Hz one is much much smoother (I had to buy a gaming mouse, because most normal mice won't update at more than 100Hz I think). And movies don't have this jerky motion where 60Hz doesn't quite exactly divide with 24 fps that movies use.
- lesserknowndan 13y agoWell, in my day, when you moved a window all the computer showed was a grey square - no fps issues there. Sorry, had to say it.
- fdkz 13y agoI started with zx-spectrum and was also very happy with whatever was there :) But baby steps towards moving pictures that are indistinguishable from reality.. Eh, I'm just very picky. Ever noticed that the top side of a moving window moves before the bottom side on most LCD displays?
- brownbat 13y agoFor a counterpoint: http://www.tweakguides.com/Graphics_5.html http://www.tweakguides.com/Graphics_5.html Citing: http://amo.net/NT/02-21-01FPS.html http://amo.net/NT/02-21-01FPS.html and: http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm The human eye's ability to detect change exceeds 200 fps, though "fps" isn't really a good match for how the eyes process information, which is highly dependent upon the scene in question.
- Sssnake 13y agoHaha, good one. Isn't trolling against the rules here though?