I won't comment on the efficiency of the algorithm (although it is questionable). Let's assume that it's a bad design decision. Your logic behind it being prej

I won't comment on the efficiency of the algorithm (although it is questionable). Let's assume that it's a bad design decision. Your logic behind it being prejudiced is still faulty, as it ascribes a fallacious cause. The algorithm merely shuffles page rankings based on two criteria: upvotes and comments, both of which are user-supplied. The algorithm does not support prejudice, it simply behaves in the fashion it is programmed to. You're completely ignoring all of the mundane stories that go down due to the same factors, and cherry picking the ones about sexism.