>>YC made changed that into being a >25y founder disadvantegous. Disagree with this point, unless you mean relative to pre-2005. I'd argue that it brought the

>>YC made changed that into being a >25y founder disadvantegous. Disagree with this point, unless you mean relative to pre-2005. I'd argue that it brought the age range of founders closer to the optimal spread, rather than bias against founders above 25. It just made investors admit that there's not an age at which you suddenly become "founder" material.