2 ms·
> If you consume the same amount of resources/services I do, and you happen to make more money than me, how come is it "fair" for you to pay more taxes? Becaus
by gnaritas 13y ago
> If you consume the same amount of resources/services I do, and you happen to make more money than me, how come is it "fair" for you to pay more taxes?
Because of the marginal utility of money and the burden of taxation. A 10% tax hurts someone living on the margin far more than someone living with excess and thus the burden is not shared fairly. Taxation of income is more fair than taxation of consumption because the burden is shared more equally. Not the "amount", the "burden".
> Percentage-wise, a consumption-based tax could take more from the "poor and middle class".
Which is what matters.
> In absolute terms, not so much.
Irrelevant, see above.
> Incentives to saving - economically debatable for a government
Not their job.
> Good for the environment. Imagine if China actually had to start paying for things like carbon credits.
Not on topic, this doesn't require consumption taxes.
- rglullis 13y agoThe problem with changing "amount" for "burden" like you do is that we stop talking about something objective and start thinking in subjective terms. And I really don't want governments to be subjective, especially when there is a better measure available and can be used.