3 ms·

Looks like an error to me. Here's their second graph. http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/design/2014/01/SubredditGrowthOverTime-2006.png http://www.wired.com/im

• bjz_ 13y ago
  Buried in the text: > He notes that the site was never 100 percent NSFW; his graph leaves out /r/reddit.com for purposes of legibility. This is a problem of poor axis labelling. It should be: "Fraction of posts submitted to Reddit.com (excluding /r/reddit.com)". The other issue is that the other graphs that include /r/reddit.com are hidden in the slideshow at the top. It's clearer in the actual blog post: http://www.randalolson.com/2013/03/12/retracing-the-evolution-of-reddit-through-post-data/ http://www.randalolson.com/2013/03/12/retracing-the-evolutio...