3 ms·
Did the graph get updated? The one I'm looking at shows nsfw peaking at 5%, but only ever being a small fraction of the total content.
by timcederman 13y ago
Did the graph get updated? The one I'm looking at shows nsfw peaking at 5%, but only ever being a small fraction of the total content.
- corresation 13y agohttp://www.wired.com/images_blogs/design/2014/01/reddit1.jpg http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/design/2014/01/reddit1.jpg That's the current graph, seemingly showing nsfw as 100% of Reddit content at the beginning of 2006.
- timcederman 13y agoLooks like an error to me. Here's their second graph. http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/design/2014/01/SubredditGrowthOverTime-2006.png http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/design/2014/01/SubredditGr...
- bjz_ 13y agoBuried in the text: > He notes that the site was never 100 percent NSFW; his graph leaves out /r/reddit.com for purposes of legibility. This is a problem of poor axis labelling. It should be: "Fraction of posts submitted to Reddit.com (excluding /r/reddit.com)". The other issue is that the other graphs that include /r/reddit.com are hidden in the slideshow at the top. It's clearer in the actual blog post: http://www.randalolson.com/2013/03/12/retracing-the-evolution-of-reddit-through-post-data/ http://www.randalolson.com/2013/03/12/retracing-the-evolutio...