2 ms·
And that was a mistake? I don't see the principle that can stand against any regulation no matter how ill-advised when the counter argument is "you must hate hi
by twoodfin 13y ago
And that was a mistake? I don't see the principle that can stand against any regulation no matter how ill-advised when the counter argument is "you must hate highways and the internet".
It's a great argument against someone who demands no regulations or laws, sure.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- icebraining 13y agoIt's a great argument against someone who demands no regulations or laws, sure No, not really. Playing Devil's advocate, if a thief robs a lot of money along the years, and the donates part to charity, must you hate charity to oppose the thief? That argument is only valid if we assume that ends justify the means.