3 ms·
The story was that the "perp" claims he didn't even send the invite, that Google must've generated it for him. The moral of the story is that you might be a us
by Jgrubb 13y ago
The story was that the "perp" claims he didn't even send the invite, that Google must've generated it for him. The moral of the story is that you might be a user of G+ and not even know it.
Read the article before boiling it down for us.
- jessaustin 13y agoFrom TFA, a perfect example of how joining G+ could lead to this predicament: And by default, when someone joins Google+ and that person is in your Gmail contacts, Google will automatically send you a notification, along with an invitation suggesting that you "add him [or her] to your Circles to stay connected." In such a scenario, the alleged unrestrained person could be held responsible for the fact that his alleged target had received emails from him at any time in the past, such as before the order was requested or before they even "broke up". It may well be that there are other scenarios that require even less interaction.