3 ms·
Yeah, I agree that the costs are awful. The guys coming back aren't like they were when they left, for sure. But how can we know the costs of not going? It's
by alexgartrell 17y ago
Yeah, I agree that the costs are awful. The guys coming back aren't like they were when they left, for sure.
But how can we know the costs of not going? It's really hard to nail it down to any particular influence, but there hasn't been a domestic attack since 9/11, and it'd be foolish to say that the war in Afghanistan hasn't played a role.
Regardless, it was a hard choice, and easy to second guess. But that doesn't mean it's time to sit back and say "Yep, never should have went there in the first place." The better thing to wonder is "Where from here?"
- andreyf 17y agoit'd be foolish to say that the war in Afghanistan hasn't played a role A role in what? Attacks on the US? That seems far from obvious. One thing that it certainly played a role in is opium production, which the Taliban prohibited. It certainly played a huge role (to the tune of billions of dollars), and big power shifts in the international drug trade...