3 ms·
So are sweet.js macros, or else they wouldn't need to have reimplemented GENSYM. But I get the impression (parent (parent)) had sweet.js macros mixed up with C-
by aaronem 13y ago
So are sweet.js macros, or else they wouldn't need to have reimplemented GENSYM. But I get the impression (parent (parent)) had sweet.js macros mixed up with C-style string-replacement "macros", which was what prompted my comment.
- mnemonik 13y agoSweet.js is hygienic but you can choose to be unhygienic if you want. It is the best of both worlds. http://sweetjs.org/#getting_dirty__breaking_hygiene http://sweetjs.org/#getting_dirty__breaking_hygiene