3 ms·
The problem is hardly solved. * Each jammer is different and caters to a specific type of detonator, or group of detonators. * Effective ranges aren't large e
by tdavis 17y ago
The problem is hardly solved.
* Each jammer is different and caters to a specific type of detonator, or group of detonators.
* Effective ranges aren't large enough.
* Lack of proper training for soldiers means most have no idea if the jamming device is even working; many keep them off because they interfere with radios, etc.
* The lag time between new jammer tech and proper fielding is a year+ in many cases. I rarely road in a vehicle with the "latest and greatest".
- run4yourlives 17y agoSolved as in "That's good enough for now, we'll keep working on it." Certainly more feasible that random flybys.
- tdavis 17y agoMore feasible than flybys? Certainly. Good enough for now? It will be, when my friends stop getting blown up.
- run4yourlives 17y agoNo offence intended, I'm ex-infantry myself. But yeah, good enough for the time being, until something more practical can be implemented. Sucks that not being perfect means people die, but you will never win a chess match if you try not to lose a single piece.