> The fact that you think you're pointing anything out to anyone with that second paragraph is just priceless. Posturing does not make your arguments more conv

> The fact that you think you're pointing anything out to anyone with that second paragraph is just priceless. Posturing does not make your arguments more convicing. > In GB and BG, he has only one way of telling you which is the boy. In BB, he has two. Thus, four possibilities a) GB, b) BG, c) BB and he gave you the first, d) BB and he gave you the second. How is "ways of telling" you possibly relevant to the puzzle? You're still apparently committing the same basic fallacy of ennumerating possibilities without assigning them probabilities and basing your argument on the wrong assumption that they must be equally probable. > Your brain will of course refuse to process the above due to your earlier remark and the sweet, sweet motherfucking irony it would mean. That describes exactly your behaviour in every single comment here.