4 ms·
Please GitHub add https (with SPDY) support. Willing to pay for this.
by nodesocket 13y ago
Please GitHub add https (with SPDY) support. Willing to pay for this.
- Sir_Cmpwn 13y agoMediaCrush hosts our blog [1] on GitHub pages, and we proxy it [2] with nginx to add SSL. [1] https://blog.mediacru.sh https://blog.mediacru.sh [2] https://github.com/MediaCrush/MediaCrush/blob/master/config/nginx.conf#L90 https://github.com/MediaCrush/MediaCrush/blob/master/config/... And the pages: https://github.com/MediaCrush/mediacrush.github.io https://github.com/MediaCrush/mediacrush.github.io
- nilved 13y agoWhy not just host it yourself then? You can get precompiled gzip and sane caching. The only reason I can think of to use GitHub Pages is not wanting to pay for a proper host.
- Sir_Cmpwn 13y agoTwo reasons: Deployment. It's easy as pie to deploy GitHub pages. Open-source. MediaCrush itself [1] is open-source, and we wanted the blog to be open and well tuned for pull requests and such. [1] https://github.com/MediaCrush/MediaCrush https://github.com/MediaCrush/MediaCrush
- nilved 13y agoHaving used GitHub Pages, S3 and my own VPS for hosting, a homebuilt host is by far the easiest. rsync is easier to use than git, which is a million times easier to use than S3. I might go so far as to say that storing compiled HTML on git is an antipattern, but that isn't to say that you can't mirror the generator and posts on GitHub.
- Sir_Cmpwn 13y agoWell, I would use git anyway because I want it to be under version control. I'm intimately familiar with git and I consider it no harder than rsync. There are so many benefits offered by version control that I wouldn't dream of doing it with something like rsync alone.
- krakensden 13y agoWhy? Given the restrictions of github pages, it doesn't seem like security could possibly be an issue, and it also seems like a not-particularly-compelling case for SPDY's muxing.