4 ms·

Hi, I'm the site author. Here's an experimental SVG page that addresses your comment. I may be switching to that one of these days. http://animatedengines.co

by mattk 17y ago

Hi, I'm the site author. Here's an experimental SVG page that addresses your comment. I may be switching to that one of these days. http://animatedengines.com/svg/test.xhtml http://animatedengines.com/svg/test.xhtml Thanks, everyone, for the kind words. And, I'd love to get your feedback on the SVG page. -Matt

jacquesm 17y ago
works very smooth with FF 3.0.10 on ubuntu. I've pointed my son at it and he's been talking engines to me all day long :) Thank you!
fatjonny 17y ago
The SVG animation looks much nicer. It works well in Chrome 3.0.193.0 in Windows XP.
10ren 17y ago
Cool, thanks. The main motion works for me (FF 2, linux, on a eeePC 900MHz), except for black circles that appear and disappear near the center, in 3 locations (only one is visible at a time, and sometimes none are). Here's results from your test that gives performance figures (http://animatedengines.com/svg/testp.xhtml http://animatedengines.com/svg/testp.xhtml), running with several tabs open: fps 10 20 30 50 Average overrun -0.091 30.212 46.919 59.707 (I let it update a few times to settle down before pasting the figures, so they represent an average of the "average overrun"). Maybe it doesn't matter so much if the fps is slow for more complex engines? If the change between updates is small enough, it will look pretty smooth. Is it important to be able to make the machine rotate fast? I mean, it looks cool, but does the viewer gain greater understanding from this? (I'm not being rhetorical - I really don't know. Maybe it gives an overall feel for the engine's operation). Sorry, I don't have any experience with JS animation to address the issues you mention. Some people here probably do though - or why not ask on http://stackoverflow.com http://stackoverflow.com ? It's often excellent for clear technical questions.

by mattk 17y ago

jacquesm 17y ago

works very smooth with FF 3.0.10 on ubuntu. I've pointed my son at it and he's been talking engines to me all day long :) Thank you!

fatjonny 17y ago

The SVG animation looks much nicer. It works well in Chrome 3.0.193.0 in Windows XP.

10ren 17y ago

Cool, thanks. The main motion works for me (FF 2, linux, on a eeePC 900MHz), except for black circles that appear and disappear near the center, in 3 locations (only one is visible at a time, and sometimes none are). Here's results from your test that gives performance figures (http://animatedengines.com/svg/testp.xhtml http://animatedengines.com/svg/testp.xhtml), running with several tabs open: fps 10 20 30 50 Average overrun -0.091 30.212 46.919 59.707 (I let it update a few times to settle down before pasting the figures, so they represent an average of the "average overrun"). Maybe it doesn't matter so much if the fps is slow for more complex engines? If the change between updates is small enough, it will look pretty smooth. Is it important to be able to make the machine rotate fast? I mean, it looks cool, but does the viewer gain greater understanding from this? (I'm not being rhetorical - I really don't know. Maybe it gives an overall feel for the engine's operation). Sorry, I don't have any experience with JS animation to address the issues you mention. Some people here probably do though - or why not ask on http://stackoverflow.com http://stackoverflow.com ? It's often excellent for clear technical questions.