4 ms·
Not Cool: MPAA Joins The W3C
- tzs 13y ago> All because it refuses to update its business model at the pace of technology. "All we want is brand new, big-budget entertainment in our homes for nothing. Why doesn't Hollywood get that?" --Carl Carlson
- DonGateley 13y agoThere is much that can't be consumed via the browser for the lack of DRM. I fail to see the problem with enabling it because I do believe that content providers have rights and I'll respect them to be able to consume their product. Of course the industry organizations want a say in how that is done.
- josteink 13y ago> I fail to see the problem with enabling it because I do believe that content providers have rights If they need to deliver closed content, then that's their thing. Just don't be delusional and expect to be able to do it by piggybacking on and free-loading off free and open technologies. If the "fix" for this conflict is closing down the open technology, that is a cost I'm under no circumstances willing to pay.
- DonGateley 13y agoWhat do you mean by "piggybacking and free-loading off free and open technologies." I don't understand where this "closing down" comes from. They want the option of DRM. How could they close down open technology?
- riveravaldez 13y agoMaybe this could clarify those issues, https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20131016/06583824895/drm-html5-what-is-tim-berners-lee-thinking.shtml https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20131016/06583824895/drm-h...
- thrillgore 13y agoWe desperately need to bury EME before it becomes an ecosystem where no other browser vendor can enter the marketplace and innovate with new technologies. If it takes us forking HTML5, then we better do it.