3 ms·
Here's an idea: why don't we stop giving free money to the government instead? If I didn't had to work half of the year and give ~40% of my income to a corrupt
by hcarvalhoalves 13y ago
Here's an idea: why don't we stop giving free money to the government instead?
If I didn't had to work half of the year and give ~40% of my income to a corrupt government I could have more money/time to invest and improve other people's lives directly, and a party wouldn't be able to manipulate the poor with welfare programs and stay in power indefinitely. The elite largely manages to avoid taxes anyway... the current system just slaves the workers in the name of good intentions, and is incompetent/corrupt at spending the money.
EDIT: For those who don't know, Brazil already runs a program like that since 2003. The government spends in that program about half of the budget estimated for public hospitals, roads, water and sanitation. It didn't changed the situation of the poor, public services are still crap (the only the poor have access to), there's no infrastructure to generate jobs where these poor people live. The end result is that we now have a portion of the population dependent on the federal government, and that's used to manipulate elections.
- nwzpaperman 13y agoChartalism is the school of thought that's been rebranded as modern monetary theory. In a free-floating digital currency regime, the government charges inflation to quantitatively influence the inflation-deflation dynamics of the total user base. When more people begin to look at money from a systems approach and user base, more things will be possible.