3 ms·
"Wins?" I'm not quite sure what you mean by "winning." In this case, DO is enforcing _their_ own TOS, on content that is served from _their_ servers. That seems
by untothebreach 13y ago
"Wins?" I'm not quite sure what you mean by "winning." In this case, DO is enforcing _their_ own TOS, on content that is served from _their_ servers. That seems legit to me, whether or not I think it is the right thing for them to do. Is there a law stating that they don't have a right to do this?
- voidr 13y ago> In this case, DO is enforcing _their_ own TOS, on content that is served from _their_ servers. And they are terminating a service that the OP paid with it's _own_ money. There are consumer protection laws. > Is there a law stating that they don't have a right to do this? They don't have the right to enforce the law, they are not the police, and as it turns out there are laws against slander.