2 ms·
I'm responding to the fact that OP claims MS is not a good engineering firm. I don't think that point is arguable. We are not just good, we are among the very b
by antics 13y ago
I'm responding to the fact that OP claims MS is not a good engineering firm. I don't think that point is arguable. We are not just good, we are among the very best in the world in terms of engineering achievements.
Of course, whether we survive is another question entirely! I did not speculate on this, nor would I. Who knows what the future holds, we've just this year basically bet the company on some fairly risky things.
That said, I'm all for hating on large corporations, but the idea that Cisco and Oracle -- literally the market leaders in their respective domains -- are "on their way out" because they don't innovate fast enough is not a very convincing argument. :( Precisely who poses them an existential threat at this point? I see no one at all.
- lysa 13y agoWhat is your definition of good engineering, for example, does your definition include this as being good engineering? http://googleblog.blogspot.se/2011/02/microsofts-bing-uses-google-search.html http://googleblog.blogspot.se/2011/02/microsofts-bing-uses-g...
- antics 13y agoWhat do you think my answer is going to be here, lysa? Yes? If you have actual questions for me I'm happy to answer them. But what you've asked is not a question. You're just saying that to be mean. :(