3 ms·
Compare and contrast with Norway. Also from the Grauniad: http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/feb/25/norwegian-prison-inmates-treated-like-people http://ww
by Theodores 13y ago
Compare and contrast with Norway. Also from the Grauniad:
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/feb/25/norwegian-prison-inmates-treated-like-people http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/feb/25/norwegian-pri...
Includes this idea that has not been thought of in U.S. prison policy:
"...justice for society demands that people we release from prison should be less likely to cause further harm or distress to others, and better equipped to live as law-abiding citizens."
Note how the Norwegian system treated the Oslo bomber, by giving him a decent prison existence rather than treating him as the worst of the worst. This has denied him notoriety. He can't 'pay' for his crimes by being cruelly treated.
In Norway the re-offending rate is a fraction of anywhere else. So, for the Norwegian taxpayer, the deluxe facilities make financial sense.
It would take strong leadership and a generation to move the U.S. 'let them die by lethal injection' to something more like what there is in Norway, however, as Idaho illustrates, moves in the right direction can be made by individual states.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- coolsunglasses 13y agoThose approaches have worked better in highly homogenous and culturally integrated societies. I'm not saying the US shouldn't experiment with such approaches, it's my dearest wish that my country take advantage of Federalism and experiment at the state level more. We shouldn't pretend we can appropriate every policy or approach every other country uses in a totally different context.
- krakensden 13y ago> Those approaches have worked better in highly homogenous and culturally integrated societies. Translated into from dog-whistle into English, this means "a strong bloc of white Americans will not pay for social services, safety nets, or anything else if there is a risk that black people could benefit." Just so we're entirely clear on the dynamic we're talking about.
- coolsunglasses 13y agoBest counterexample is Canada, if you want to be more convincing and less inflammatory.