5 ms·

Animated Engines

• cousin_it 17y ago
  Fascinating. And I had no idea that most engines could be explained in a 2D picture, without the need to go 3D.
• jacquesm 17y ago
  by far my favourite: http://www.animatedengines.com/vstirling.shtml http://www.animatedengines.com/vstirling.shtml
• 10ren 17y ago
  Looks cool, so I feel churlish complaining, but I'd prefer it if the speed was varied by changing the distance/rotation moved, rather than the time delay between frames. i.e. like true slow-motion from a high fps camera. EDIT unfortunately, the approach he used precludes this: http://www.animatedengines.com/howto.shtml http://www.animatedengines.com/howto.shtml I guess it illustrates how rare it is to combine domain expertise (like that guy has), with an unrelated expertise in animation. If you have both (or access to them), you can make difficult things much easier, and so create value.
  • jacquesm 17y ago
    I think you could probably make a good case that any kind of real breakthrough combined more than one domain of knowledge.
  • mattk 17y ago
    Hi, I'm the site author. Here's an experimental SVG page that addresses your comment. I may be switching to that one of these days. http://animatedengines.com/svg/test.xhtml http://animatedengines.com/svg/test.xhtml Thanks, everyone, for the kind words. And, I'd love to get your feedback on the SVG page. -Matt
    • jacquesm 17y ago
      works very smooth with FF 3.0.10 on ubuntu. I've pointed my son at it and he's been talking engines to me all day long :) Thank you!
    • fatjonny 17y ago
      The SVG animation looks much nicer. It works well in Chrome 3.0.193.0 in Windows XP.
    • 10ren 17y ago
      Cool, thanks. The main motion works for me (FF 2, linux, on a eeePC 900MHz), except for black circles that appear and disappear near the center, in 3 locations (only one is visible at a time, and sometimes none are). Here's results from your test that gives performance figures (http://animatedengines.com/svg/testp.xhtml http://animatedengines.com/svg/testp.xhtml), running with several tabs open: fps 10 20 30 50 Average overrun -0.091 30.212 46.919 59.707 (I let it update a few times to settle down before pasting the figures, so they represent an average of the "average overrun"). Maybe it doesn't matter so much if the fps is slow for more complex engines? If the change between updates is small enough, it will look pretty smooth. Is it important to be able to make the machine rotate fast? I mean, it looks cool, but does the viewer gain greater understanding from this? (I'm not being rhetorical - I really don't know. Maybe it gives an overall feel for the engine's operation). Sorry, I don't have any experience with JS animation to address the issues you mention. Some people here probably do though - or why not ask on http://stackoverflow.com http://stackoverflow.com ? It's often excellent for clear technical questions.
• sanj 17y ago
  I love old aircraft rotary engines: http://www.animatedengines.com/gnome.shtml http://www.animatedengines.com/gnome.shtml Aside, this is one of the few sites that makes legitimate use of animated gifs.
• lowkey 17y ago
  As a mechanical engineer may I say, "This is simply awesome!"
• okeumeni 17y ago
  I always have a great deal of respect for a person who takes time to share knowledge is such an amazing way. Great Job!!