4 ms·

Exactly. Everything about how Google handled this is wrong, in my opinion. I couldn't care less about RapGenius - they're just a symptom of the underlying pro

Exactly. Everything about how Google handled this is wrong, in my opinion. I couldn't care less about RapGenius - they're just a symptom of the underlying problem which is we don't have any real competition in the search engine market, and we're paying for it with unfair antics like this. Longer thoughts here: http://peebs.org/2014/01/04/we-need-viable-search-engine-competition-now/ http://peebs.org/2014/01/04/we-need-viable-search-engine-com...

mtrimpe 13y ago
Very much so. Google's decisions are starting to have impacts on other companies' bottom lines which easily run into the millions of dollars. Just as a thought experiment ... how tempting do you think it would be for Google to do the following: 1) Run a query to identify all companies that cut their AdWords spending over 50% over the last year. 2) Look at which of these companies are now getting significant numbers of click from organic results. 3) Find out what is causing them to rank high organically. 4) Penalize them using a generic message and refuse on principle to answer any inquiries as to why. Apart from (anec-)data that seems to be pointing towards this already happening; should we be OK as a market with this approach? Especially when considering that the rules are so vague that almost every site is guaranteed to break some of Google's guidelines?
- blauwbilgorgel 13y ago
  >Apart from evidence that seems to be pointing towards this already happening; Please provide this evidence. I am getting a bit tired of this misinformation. Organic search and paid search are silo'd. To say that Google favors advertisers in the organic results or the other way round, is simply not true. It would destroy Google's credibility. >how tempting do you think it would be for Google It approaches conspiracy thinking. I love that, but I think HN is not the place. You are basically accusing a company of a very evil act, without proper evidence. Do you realize that many Googlers frequent this site? It would be a shame if all they get to read are conspiracy theories and baseless accusations. >Especially when considering that the rules are so vague that almost every site is guaranteed to break some Hogwash. Their rules are very clear and succinct. https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/35769?hl=en https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/35769?hl=en Maybe if you want to spam or manipulate, then these rules are vague. Maybe when you don't read the guidelines then they are vague. I bet that if you can point to a rule that almost every site breaks, without them knowing, then Google will adjust that rule to be more clear. You can not please them all. >Penalize them using a generic message and refuse on principle to answer any inquiries as to why. You can certainly not please the spammers that were caught with their hands in the cookie jar and then take to the internet to say that Google is unfair, and that the big brands get away with anything.
  - ForHackernews 13y ago
    > Organic search and paid search are silo'd. According to who? Google? Is there any transparency or any way for an outsider to verify that?
    - blauwbilgorgel 13y ago
      Yes. According to Google. It is a myth that is years old. Matt Cutts answers: Do AdWords customers get special treatment in organic search results? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aV5DmL_eog http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aV5DmL_eog If there is evidence that Google gives special treatment to Adwords customers in organic search then this could be verified as a lie. As long as this evidence remains nothing more than accusations and suspicions, then I choose to believe Google that there is no teacup orbiting Venus. It seems unlikely, but not impossible. I am willing to sway my view when I get evidence. Till then, I will treat it as a common newbie myth.
  - woah 13y ago
    In other words- "They just wouldn't!"
  - mtrimpe 13y ago
    > Their rules are very clear and succinct. If I think of a lot of things my users would search for and try to create valuable information for them concerning those queries... is that valuable content or are those doorway pages? If I give when someone few months of my service for free when they write a nice article with a link to my site... is that good customer service or a link scheme? If I create a press release on PR Web and link to my service with an appropriate keyword ... is that participating in a link scheme? None of these cases are all that clear cut and I for one am not comfortable with Google being the judge, jury and executioner. > It approaches conspiracy thinking. That's not the point. The point is that Google is a massive company wielding massive power. When it comes to fighting a penalization their position is that they don't need to defend their decisions, implying that they can be trusted not to abuse their position and hence deserve to have the final say, legally, over these decisions. I don't buy that and think it's about time that contesting Google penalties in court becomes a regular thing.
ryguytilidie 13y ago
Every single startup I've worked for, one of the objectives was to befriend Matt Cutts so you would have a quick line to getting stuff like this fixed. Seems like a reasonable amount of power to give one person/company...

mtrimpe 13y ago

Very much so. Google's decisions are starting to have impacts on other companies' bottom lines which easily run into the millions of dollars. Just as a thought experiment ... how tempting do you think it would be for Google to do the following: 1) Run a query to identify all companies that cut their AdWords spending over 50% over the last year. 2) Look at which of these companies are now getting significant numbers of click from organic results. 3) Find out what is causing them to rank high organically. 4) Penalize them using a generic message and refuse on principle to answer any inquiries as to why. Apart from (anec-)data that seems to be pointing towards this already happening; should we be OK as a market with this approach? Especially when considering that the rules are so vague that almost every site is guaranteed to break some of Google's guidelines?

blauwbilgorgel 13y ago
>Apart from evidence that seems to be pointing towards this already happening; Please provide this evidence. I am getting a bit tired of this misinformation. Organic search and paid search are silo'd. To say that Google favors advertisers in the organic results or the other way round, is simply not true. It would destroy Google's credibility. >how tempting do you think it would be for Google It approaches conspiracy thinking. I love that, but I think HN is not the place. You are basically accusing a company of a very evil act, without proper evidence. Do you realize that many Googlers frequent this site? It would be a shame if all they get to read are conspiracy theories and baseless accusations. >Especially when considering that the rules are so vague that almost every site is guaranteed to break some Hogwash. Their rules are very clear and succinct. https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/35769?hl=en https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/35769?hl=en Maybe if you want to spam or manipulate, then these rules are vague. Maybe when you don't read the guidelines then they are vague. I bet that if you can point to a rule that almost every site breaks, without them knowing, then Google will adjust that rule to be more clear. You can not please them all. >Penalize them using a generic message and refuse on principle to answer any inquiries as to why. You can certainly not please the spammers that were caught with their hands in the cookie jar and then take to the internet to say that Google is unfair, and that the big brands get away with anything.
- ForHackernews 13y ago
  > Organic search and paid search are silo'd. According to who? Google? Is there any transparency or any way for an outsider to verify that?
  - blauwbilgorgel 13y ago
    Yes. According to Google. It is a myth that is years old. Matt Cutts answers: Do AdWords customers get special treatment in organic search results? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aV5DmL_eog http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aV5DmL_eog If there is evidence that Google gives special treatment to Adwords customers in organic search then this could be verified as a lie. As long as this evidence remains nothing more than accusations and suspicions, then I choose to believe Google that there is no teacup orbiting Venus. It seems unlikely, but not impossible. I am willing to sway my view when I get evidence. Till then, I will treat it as a common newbie myth.
- woah 13y ago
  In other words- "They just wouldn't!"
- mtrimpe 13y ago
  > Their rules are very clear and succinct. If I think of a lot of things my users would search for and try to create valuable information for them concerning those queries... is that valuable content or are those doorway pages? If I give when someone few months of my service for free when they write a nice article with a link to my site... is that good customer service or a link scheme? If I create a press release on PR Web and link to my service with an appropriate keyword ... is that participating in a link scheme? None of these cases are all that clear cut and I for one am not comfortable with Google being the judge, jury and executioner. > It approaches conspiracy thinking. That's not the point. The point is that Google is a massive company wielding massive power. When it comes to fighting a penalization their position is that they don't need to defend their decisions, implying that they can be trusted not to abuse their position and hence deserve to have the final say, legally, over these decisions. I don't buy that and think it's about time that contesting Google penalties in court becomes a regular thing.

ryguytilidie 13y ago

Every single startup I've worked for, one of the objectives was to befriend Matt Cutts so you would have a quick line to getting stuff like this fixed. Seems like a reasonable amount of power to give one person/company...