3 ms·
Something I couldn't have in principle with Common Lisps? Plus predictable and controllable native code generation, efficient zero-copy FFI, come on.) And, you
by dschiptsov 13y ago
Something I couldn't have in principle with Common Lisps? Plus predictable and controllable native code generation, efficient zero-copy FFI, come on.)
And, you know, except for reader macros, Haskell..) Let's take it easy - I am familiar with the concepts Clojure is based upon.
- Skinney 13y agoYou could have that in principle in any language. In Clojure it's built-in and idiomatic. Besides, there are people who prefer Clojure over Common Lisp and Scheme. You asked why anyone would want Clojure without the JVM, I just told you there are many benefits, especially if your prefered language already is Clojure. Haskell really is something entirely diffrent than Clojure. Staticly typed, monads, template haskell. It's a nice language, but not as easy to use as Clojure IMHO.