4 ms·

"For example, producing skinless chicken and leaner meats requires more work at the processing plant." So buying healthier pre-prepared food is more expensive

"For example, producing skinless chicken and leaner meats requires more work at the processing plant." So buying healthier pre-prepared food is more expensive than buying less healthy pre-prepared food. I wonder if they compare with food prepared healthily at home, or produced healthily at home. Reminds me, it's time to plant a handful of beans.

hayksaakian 13y ago
I suspect home cooking healthy food would be better. The human power needed to replicate processed food is greater than simple preparation of healthy food.
Karunamon 13y ago
The problem you run into there is lack of prep time. The obesity epidemic largely impacts poorer people. The poorer you are, the less time you have to yourself, moreso if you have a family. It starts making sense from a time standpoint to just hit the nearest drive through instead of buying ingredients and actually cooking.
- hershel 13y ago
  In theory you could cook once weekly, and freeze everything. If optimized it could take only a few hours,and could be a shared family activity. But it's still work, and being a working poor is exhausting so i understand them preferring to rest.
  - ochs 13y ago
    I live in a very small apartment and only have a very small freezer inside of my fridge. I suspect that many poor people may not have enough space for a big freezer, not enough money to get a decent efficient one and/or not enough money to pay for the electricity.
- rwallace 13y ago
  One aspect of the problem is this idea that seems to have crept in, that it's necessary to eat elaborately cooked meals all the time. Making a couple of cheese sandwiches actually takes a lot less time than hitting the nearest drive-through, as well as being both healthier and cheaper.
  - Karunamon 13y ago
    I'm not so sure about that.. I'd think that a dollar burger and a dollar chicken sandwich is more nutritionally balanced than a cheese sandwich, preservatives and fat be damned. There's also the staples, rice and beans and whatnot, but that's boring as heck. Fast food also wins on tastiness.. and since we're not robots, that's vitally important.
    - rwallace 13y ago
      Your second paragraph is the answer to the first. The issue isn't nutritional balance - a good multivitamin pill costs ten cents per day if that's what you're worried about. The issue is that fast food is designed to exploit security flaws in your motivation system. That's one of the reasons Americans in particular are suffering so badly from the obesity epidemic despite food being available in effectively unlimited quantity in every developed country. Doubtless given another few thousand years, evolution would patch some of the security flaws, but that doesn't do you any good right now. All you can do as an individual to protect yourself is stay away from fast food.

hayksaakian 13y ago

I suspect home cooking healthy food would be better. The human power needed to replicate processed food is greater than simple preparation of healthy food.

Karunamon 13y ago

The problem you run into there is lack of prep time. The obesity epidemic largely impacts poorer people. The poorer you are, the less time you have to yourself, moreso if you have a family. It starts making sense from a time standpoint to just hit the nearest drive through instead of buying ingredients and actually cooking.

hershel 13y ago
In theory you could cook once weekly, and freeze everything. If optimized it could take only a few hours,and could be a shared family activity. But it's still work, and being a working poor is exhausting so i understand them preferring to rest.
- ochs 13y ago
  I live in a very small apartment and only have a very small freezer inside of my fridge. I suspect that many poor people may not have enough space for a big freezer, not enough money to get a decent efficient one and/or not enough money to pay for the electricity.
rwallace 13y ago
One aspect of the problem is this idea that seems to have crept in, that it's necessary to eat elaborately cooked meals all the time. Making a couple of cheese sandwiches actually takes a lot less time than hitting the nearest drive-through, as well as being both healthier and cheaper.
- Karunamon 13y ago
  I'm not so sure about that.. I'd think that a dollar burger and a dollar chicken sandwich is more nutritionally balanced than a cheese sandwich, preservatives and fat be damned. There's also the staples, rice and beans and whatnot, but that's boring as heck. Fast food also wins on tastiness.. and since we're not robots, that's vitally important.
  - rwallace 13y ago
    Your second paragraph is the answer to the first. The issue isn't nutritional balance - a good multivitamin pill costs ten cents per day if that's what you're worried about. The issue is that fast food is designed to exploit security flaws in your motivation system. That's one of the reasons Americans in particular are suffering so badly from the obesity epidemic despite food being available in effectively unlimited quantity in every developed country. Doubtless given another few thousand years, evolution would patch some of the security flaws, but that doesn't do you any good right now. All you can do as an individual to protect yourself is stay away from fast food.