2 ms·
I'm not sure why this particular question is relevant. It seems to assume that members of Congress should be better protected in their privacy than the rest of
by CWuestefeld 13y ago
I'm not sure why this particular question is relevant. It seems to assume that members of Congress should be better protected in their privacy than the rest of us.
But I submit that the opposite is true: they should be scrutinized to a much greater degree, and (nearly) everything they do in their office should be an open book to us.
- ColinWright 13y agoExactly so - they've suddenly twug that the NSA surveillance doesn't just apply to other people, and that they are, in fact, "Persons of Interest."
- a3n 13y agoYes, but I suspect this particular Senator wasn't interested in privilege, but in backing the NSA into a corner. Because of course Congress is being spied on; they have phones.